"Scout" wrote in
:



"Sid9" sid9@ bellsouth.net wrote in message
...

"RD Sandman" wrote in message
...
John Smith wrote in news:irec2j$3ri$1@dont-
email.me:

On 5/23/2011 9:59 AM, RD Sandman wrote:
John wrote in news:irbjfe$naf$1@dont-
email.me:

On 5/22/2011 10:58 AM, RHF wrote:
...
- It is the University of California at Santa Cruz
- who you are calling idiots.

Well Now... any Institution of Higher Learning
with 'Slug' {For Brains} as their Mascot is a
http://www.kohoso.us/images/ucsc.png
place that 'I' am not Banana's about. ~ RHF
http://www.ucsc.edu/about/mascot.html
-wrt- Sammy the Slug
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_of_California,
_Santa_Cruz#Mascot
...
Since the figures are actually a summary of the federal reserve
and govt. figures, the ultimate message comes from them ... you
will
notice,
no one is able to come up with figures which dispute them -- that
often
happens with the truth ...
Particularly when you post both sides.......you didn't.

Whoever make the money pays the bill ... no-brainer ... this
financial crisis is just working out those terms.

However, you wish to tax the wealthy even more even when the stats
show that they pay about where they should be when looking at the
amount of wealth or income that they show.


The wealthy, whose income is reported on 1099s, pay a lower effective
tax rate then people whose income is report on a W-2.
Up to 33% if you work at a job.....10% on dividends......for not
working.

Excuse me, but what exactly do you mean by "effective tax rate"?

I don't think he has any idea, but it 'sounds good'.

Is that some sort of realspeech for "we need to tax them for an even
larger share than what they have to pay now?"



--
Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman)

If you woke up this morning....
Don't complain.