On May 26, 12:23*am, oldwifetale wrote:
But enough about *the present*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It is writen when they ring in their new Age of Aquarius on December
21,2012

Its going to be worse than the past!

How can you know?
Just because "it's written"?

The December 21st date in 2012 is derived from the Mayan calendars
which do not specifically or even allegorically allude to an "Age of
Aquarius".

The 'ages' of the zodiac, if consisting of 12 signs, are approximately
2160 years long based on the precession of the equinoxes. The
precession rate is about 1 degree per 72 years. If the beginning of
the "Age of Aquarius" is 2012, then the "Age of Pisces" would have
commenced around 48 BCE. It is possible (the timing). Most likely the
"Age of Aquarius" marks a reversal in the polarity of the 'Great
Year' (25,920 - 26,000 years), as indicated by the Egyptian Sphinx -
it would be a point that is about 13,000 years after the "Age of Leo"
marked the spring equinox.

If the zodiac being considered consists of 13 signs rather than 12,
then the length of each 'age' would be somewhat shorter, just under
2000 years. That is also possible (the timing).

There really is no reason to assume that *Freemasons* or even *Knights
Templar* ever wrote anything concerning the date of December 21, 2012
unless you are suggesting pre-Columbian contact, and knowledge (and
correct interpretation) of the Mayan calendars - since both groups
actually existed before 1492.

*Or* perhaps you're trying to say that this precise date was non-
arbitrarily selected as a catastrophic 'end point' by two separate
groups of people on both sides of the Atlantic ocean, indicating a
well-hidden awareness of a planetary cycle, and one that was not held
exclusively by people in either the western or eastern hemisphere.

Is that what you're suggesting?

Sure it is. And in that case, you may be on to something.

(gawd, i'm ornery...)

"It is written,so shall it be done"

The Sunworshipers base all their belief on astrology and mythology!