View Single Post
  #143   Report Post  
Old May 27th 11, 01:06 AM posted to talk.politics.guns,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.rush-limbaugh,rec.radio.shortwave,alt.conspiracy
Scout Scout is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 207
Default Financial wealth, or JUST WHO SHOULD PAY FOR ALL OF THIS?



"gfn" wrote in message
...
On May 26, 4:04 pm, Gray Ghost
wrote:
gfn wrote in news:cd664af5-c0a8-4200-a50e-2cdb60b5a031
@w21g2000yqm.googlegroups.com:











On May 26, 3:20 pm, Gray Ghost
wrote:
gfn wrote in news:5e36036b-9c38-4449-8578-
:


Under the FairTax
- wholesale = $50
- compliance costs = - $23
- FairTax = $23
- sales and other taxes = $27
- Grand total = $100


You are obviously a Democrat.


Then Herman Cain must be too because he supports the FairTax.


--
Herman Cain for President! http://hermancain.c
om/
If you don't support him you are a Racist!!
He beat Cancer. He'll beat Obama (who is just like cancer)


Remember Desert One, Carter 0? Ain't it sad to wish that Obama had as

muc
h
ambition but being glad he doesn't knowing he doesn't have THAT much
competence?


I refer to your math.

wholesale = $50
compliance costs = - $23
FairTax = $23
sales and other taxes = $27

Unless they changed the rules of math by Congressionl decree that's $123.


You can refer to my math, in return I will refer to your reading
comprehension. Was there something about "- $23" (read minus $23)
that you didn't get? I guess the example wasn't simple enough for
you.


Yep, and HOW exactly do you assume that compliance with sales and other
taxes will suddenly be reduced to zero, when they will still need to comply
and that it will cost absolutely NOTHING to comply with the additional
FairTax imposed?