On May 29, 12:33*am, John Smith wrote:
On 5/29/2011 12:16 AM, wrote:





On May 26, 3:46 pm, *wrote:
On May 26, 12:23 am, *wrote:

But enough about *the present*.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It is writen when they ring in their new Age of Aquarius on December
21,2012

Its going to be worse than the past!

How can you know?
Just because "it's written"?

The December 21st date in 2012 is derived from the Mayan calendars
which do not specifically or even allegorically allude to an "Age of
Aquarius".

The 'ages' of the zodiac, if consisting of 12 signs, are approximately
2160 years long based on the precession of the equinoxes. The
precession rate is about 1 degree per 72 years. If the beginning of
the "Age of Aquarius" is 2012, then the "Age of Pisces" would have
commenced around 48 BCE. It is possible (the timing). Most likely the
"Age of Aquarius" marks a reversal in the polarity of the 'Great
Year' (25,920 - 26,000 years), as indicated by the Egyptian Sphinx -
it would be a point that is about 13,000 years after the "Age of Leo"
marked the spring equinox.

If the zodiac being considered consists of 13 signs rather than 12,
then the length of each 'age' would be somewhat shorter, just under
2000 years. That is also possible (the timing).

There really is no reason to assume that *Freemasons* or even *Knights
Templar* ever wrote anything concerning the date of December 21, 2012
unless you are suggesting pre-Columbian contact, and knowledge (and
correct interpretation) of the Mayan calendars - since both groups
actually existed before 1492.

*Or* perhaps you're trying to say that this precise date was non-
arbitrarily selected as a catastrophic 'end point' by two separate
groups of people on both sides of the Atlantic ocean, indicating a
well-hidden awareness of a planetary cycle, and one that was not held
exclusively by people in either the western or eastern hemisphere.

Is that what you're suggesting?

Sure it is. And in that case, you may be on to something.

(gawd, i'm ornery...)

"It is written,so shall it be done"

The Sunworshipers base all their belief on astrology and mythology!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Asia is NOT attacking The USA and NATO: Millions are Dying because the
United Snakes and Europe are Attacking the Innocent People of the
Middle East

Well, recently it was found that Libya having 5 times the oil reserves
previously thought helps spark the interest of the shadow government.

The fact that Libya is solvent and not under tons of debt is one more
incentive.

The fact that Libya has considerable gold reserves it but another incentive.

The fact that Libya provide free medical care/drugs and education up to
the PhD levels is another incentive, the shadow government does not like
its' slaves expecting the same ...

Etc., etc., etc.

Regards,
JS- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Yes, Khadaffi is aligned with other parts of Africa, and he had
supported the Palestinian cause, his country does have a social net,
and if the neo-liberals of US and the Nato get control of Lybia, the
social net may be erased. Als Khadaffi did not do the Lockerbie jet
liner bombing. That was done by the CIA and European intelligence
agencies. Just like with Malosovic, the corrupt international court at
the Hague couldn't convict him, so NATO and the US just poisoned him
to death in prison. Welsey Clark told Amy Goodman on Democracy Now! in
2003, that the US was going to attack these countries, Iraq, Iran,
Afghanistan, Lybia, Somalia, and two others I can't remember off the
top of my head. Since then they have all been attacked, with some sort
of invented pretexts like using B-52 for humanitarian purposes.