"RHF" wrote in message
...
On May 28, 8:31 am, Peter Franks wrote:
On 5/28/2011 7:54 AM, Deep Dudu wrote:









On Sat, 28 May 2011 10:13:56 -0400, "Scout"
wrote:

"Sid9"sid9@ bellsouth.net wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On May 27, 3:01 pm, John wrote:
On 5/27/2011 2:53 PM, Peter Franks wrote:

...
What is wrong with this country?

There are only two possible answers I can think of:

1) The worst imbecilic-idiot-morons in government are honestly
attempting correct fixes and a return to a decent America.

-- or --

2) The government is tightly controlled by a shadow government
criminal
element and this is exactly their plan, to weaken and gain absolute
police state control over all American citizens.

But then, the solution to both is the same, imprison or hang either
the
imbecilic-idiot-morons or imprison the crooks!

Regards,
JS

JS -please- This is not simply the
"Democrat reveal plan. Tax more spend more"

-it's- Democrats Reveal New& Improved Plan :
More New Taxes and More Improved Spending !
-the-'more'-'more'-plan-
* Democrats Promise You More New& Improved
Taxes {We Are The Wiser Taxers}
* Democrats Promise You More New& Improved
Spending {We Are The Wiser Spenders}

-remember- You Can Trust Us 'Democrats' To
Tax You More& Spend More of Your Tax Money
-we-have-a-proven-history-of-doing-just-that-

and that is the way 'i' see it ~ RHF
-vote-yes-on-no- -check-none-of-the-above-
.
.

Yes we need some taxes, America being a low tax nation

What a great idea, then we could be more like Italy and Turkey.

Cutting taxes on the wealthy has NEVER stimulated the economy. Taxing
the hell out of them and putting the money directly into the economy
will. We should go to a top rate of 98% and cut all tax loopholes
and tax interest, dividend, and capital gains exactlyt he same as
wages.

- Why should the wealthy pay more than
- their fair share?

? Define "Their Fair Share" !
.
Who Benefits By Our Society ?
-and- What Is Their Reward ?
Beyond The Ability to Live a Reasonable
Life Food, Cloth and House Their Family.
-four-examples-
.
1st -Taxing the $5K 'Disposable Income' @ 20%
of the average Working Man {Family} :
Leaves them with just $4K.
.
2nd - Taxing the $25K 'Disposable Income'
@ 20% of the High Income Earner {Family} :
Leaves them with just $20K.
.
3rd -Taxing the $250K 'Disposable Income'
@ 20% of the Very High Income Earner {Family} :
Leaves them with just $200K; and that is
Four-Times [4X] the Gross Income of the
average Working Man {Family}.
.
4rd - Taxing the $2.5M 'Disposable Income'
@ 20% of the Rich and Wealth {Family} :
Leaves them with just $2.0M; and that is
Forty-Times [40X] the Gross Income of the
average Working Man {Family}; and this
Ensures High Income Earners Pay* Their Fair
{Equal} Share of the Cost of American Society.
* Simply Paying Back To {Into} The Society :
That Which You Have Received Greatly From It
-paying-back-social-responsibility-reciprocity-

snip

Seems to me you're simply bitching because there is an advantage to busting
ass and getting ahead. Because while they end up with X times more than case
number one, they also paid X times more. Seems your gripe is that they still
have more disposable income left over and somehow you don't see that as
fair.

So tell us, why should they be forced to pay more? Because you think it's
fair that we sock it to the rich?