View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 2nd 11, 03:49 AM posted to alt.politics,talk.politics.misc,talk.politics.guns,rec.radio.shortwave,rec.sport.golf
joeturn joeturn is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 206
Default Why wasn't Bin Laden captured and tried for 911?

On May 6, 2:14*pm, Jah Wobble wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On 5/6/2011 10:17 AM, Jah Wobble wrote:


* US * wrote:


On Fri, 6 May 2011 07:50:00 -0700 (PDT), harry k
idiotically
wrote:


The usual descriptions of sights and sounds of any building undergoing
a collapse


When demolished ...


That's what happens when very large airliners filled with fuel crashes
into them at 500 Kts, you retard.
They get demolished.


The aircraft didn't cause the fall. *The plane hit the building, the
buildings stood. *The fuel was splashed about, burnt off in ~15 mins.
and the buildings stood. *Once the fuel was burnt off, all you were left
with was a "normal" high-rise fire.


Right.. and NOTHING in the building was flamable and the sprinklers were
in perfect working order.
You retard.

I wonder who placed the demolitions in the building so precise and so
undercover, that the THOUSANDS of people that work there 24/7, never saw
anything going on. Any idear, you retard?

Burnt off in 15 minutes!
BWAAAAAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAA!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


The Ben Laden construction company put them in the building durring
construction of the towers! As stated by a real construction engineer
that was in charge of the WTC projects Paul Laffoley.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uV1mB...layer_embedded