View Single Post
  #27   Report Post  
Old June 2nd 11, 06:15 PM posted to alt.astronomy,alt.conspiracy,sci.skeptic,sci.military.naval,rec.radio.shortwave
Brad Guth Brad Guth is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2010
Posts: 73
Default JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE

On Jun 2, 7:22*am, Warhol wrote:
On Jun 2, 9:48*am, John Smith wrote:









On 6/2/2011 12:29 AM, Warhol wrote:


...
since a few NASA employees post here maybe they have something to sat
about this?


Also the opposite of what NASA says *is the truth... They will have
egg on their faces again.


No one wishes to stick their neck out and call it "ether" (or aether)
for that matter ... even Einstein attempts to acknowledge "it" as the
"cosmological effect" (basically, but denied by many, to be equiv. to a
"cosmic ether.")


I find many high schools and colleges are even "unaware" (or in some
form of denial) to Einsteins admission of a "gravitational ether."


Like I say, there is relatively "handful" of people who come right out
and deal with ether as a substantial material, in academic and research
branches.


An example of what I am referring to is this abstract:


http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991PhLA..152..458A


Or, this one:


http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0608164


Investigating with search terms composed of "gravitational ether",
"cosmic ether", "cosmological effect", etc. will show the debate is far
from over ...


However, the "effect" which seems to go wanting for a proper name has
already been covered under the name of "ether." *However, since many
have denied its' existence, but now are forced to admit "something is
there", attempt to hide their mistaken denial in a "name change
ploy/tactic." *This has more to do with human nature and the refusal to
admit mistakes than anything else ...


Actually, quite funny to watch! *Very smart people also suffer from such
ego worship ... and the fear of being ostracized by their peers ...


Simply put, you can still deny the "ether" if you just name "it"
something else, since then, you deny the "it" is ether! *ROFLOL


Regards,
JS


I wont talk anymore about this, since ether is known to be air... just
consult the ancient encyclopedia's.

and in space there ain't no ether found... there is only the infinite
void... Space does not bend. A ray/ a Beam does.

http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0109/3c175_vla.jpg

And what is an atomic clock? what a joke... science filled with untrue
claims. THE GREAT ATOMIC CLOCK SCAM! Like false religion, if they
contradict each other each time.

Maybe I should start a thread; "FAKE of CENTURY"

BTW E = mc2 is not Einstein's equation at all... The big E just made
"h" (plancks constant usable)... no such thing as dark energy/mass

no anti gravity

no black holes

Space don't bend by gravity

No Cosmic Ether

if you have specifics perhaps ask

Yids deliberately associated his name with it though for the usual
reasons of deception and promoting the meme that the self chosen are
superior intellects... the *******s who think they know, have no
p.h.u.c.k.ing clue...

PSS Ether, or luminiferous Ether, was the hypothetical substance
through which electromagnetic waves travel. It was proposed by the
greek philosopher Aristotle Eric Weisstein's World of Biography and
used by several optical theories as a way to allow propagation of
light, which was believed to be impossible in "empty" space.

http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Ether.html

So it was and they changed the laws by fraud and made all students
very dumb... the ancient knew what we don't know anymore.


Space is not empty, unless 1000 atomic particles per m3 qualifies,
plus scads of energy and force always passing through each and every
m3.

I'm not sure the innards of a black hole are empty, but there is that
remote possibility of that robust sphere of positrons being hollow and
thus having nothing at its core.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”