"corneal pye" wrote in message
...
On 11-06-05 01:12 AM, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jun 4, 7:20 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote:
On 11-06-04 07:24 PM,Iarnrodwrote:



On Jun 4, 1:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote:
On 11-06-03 10:32 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On Jun 3, 10:04 am, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote:
On 11-06-02 11:28 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On Jun 1, 11:05 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote:
On 11-06-01 08:42 PM,Iarnrodwrote:

On Jun 1, 5:29 pm, corneal pyec...@Use-Author-Supplied-
Address.invalid wrote:
On 11-06-01 08:16 AM,Iarnrodwrote:

On May 31, 10:57 pm, wrote:

Wrong . He was claimed to be dead FOUR times before the
heavily
publicized 2011 'death' ...

No he wasn't. Moron twoofers running around the past few years
claiming UBL was dead doesn't actually constitute a legitimate
claim.
It's just your own echo chamber rattling back your insanities
at you.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/2135473.stm

Thursday, 18 July, 2002, 09:15 GMT 10:15 UK
Bin Laden 'probably' dead

The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's counter-terrorism
chief, Dale
Watson, says he thinks Osama bin Laden is "probably" dead.

(Moron twoofer?)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ma-Bin-Laden-d...

The theory first received an airing in the American Spectator
magazine
earlier this year when former U.S. foreign intelligence officer
and
senior editor Angelo M. Codevilla, a professor of international
relations at Boston University, stated bluntly: 'All the
evidence
suggests Elvis Presley is more alive today than Osama Bin
Laden.'

(Moron twoofer?)

There are other doubters, too. Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of
Duke
University's religious studies' department and the foremost Bin
Laden
expert, argues that the increasingly secular language in the
video and
audio tapes of Osama (his earliest ones are littered with
references to
God and the Prophet Mohammed) are inconsistent with his strict
Islamic
religion, Wahhabism.

(Moron twoofer?)

This week, still more questions have been raised with the
publication in
America and Britain of a book called Osama Bin Laden: Dead or
Alive?

Written by political analyst and philosopher Professor David Ray
Griffin, former emeritus professor at California's Claremont
School of
Theology, it is provoking shock waves - for it goes into far
more detail
about his supposed death and suggests there has been a cover-up
by the West.

The book claims that Bin Laden died of kidney failure, or a
linked
complaint, on December 13, 2001, while living in Afghanistan's
Tora Bora
mountains close to the border with Waziristan.

His burial took place within 24 hours, in line with Muslim
religious
rules, and in an unmarked grave, which is a Wahhabi custom.

(Moron twoofer?)

--

Yes, all obviously were wrong.

But were they, to quote your claim, "Moron twoofers"?

So it would seem, dip****, since UBL was alive and well.

Oh, so they have all published additional material which qualifies
as
911 "twoof"?

Care to CITE those publications?

Don't you
feel stupid even bringing it up?

Not really, I mean citing the FBI's own "counter-terrorism chief"
isn't
exactly a weak resource, now is it?

Well...IS it?

Hint: You have nothing.

I have timely cites OF the day.

You have hindsight.

Hint - hindsight can NEVER rewrite history.

Cope.

You keep citing people's OPINIONS as FACTS.

The only "fact" I have stated is that THESE people are NOT "Moron
twoofers".

Care to DISPUTE that?

Do you normally have such trouble separating fiction from reality?

No, that seems to be your dissonance.

chuckle

Time for you to put up or shut up, how many of these resources can
you
quantify as "Moron twoofers"?

This is grand hilarity, enjoy turning on my rotisserie spit, you
silly twit.

Sad and pathetic little protests of yours, drowning in the sea of
TRUTH.

Nothing you would have bathed in...

The FACT that I have proven all my claims and debunked yours sort of
makes you look like a silly little boy here, kooker. you're circling
the drain.

Your claim was that all these people who said bin Laden was dead are
"Moron twoofers".

They are.

So you claim the FBI's counter-terrorism chief is a "twoofer", is that
your final answer?

I state again, you have NOT proved that and even you are not foolish
enough to call the FBI's counter-terrorism chief a "Moron twoofer".

He did not claim that UBL was dead.

He said "probably dead", which in the absence of a corpus delecti is the
same thing.

"probably dead" is NOT the same thing as "is dead".

Until you can separate fact from assertion and factual statement from
opinion, you're never going to be able to recognize when someone is telling
you what is true from what they simply hope is true.