On 6/6/2011 9:48 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:

...
Below, in your avoidance of the question.

God doesn't play dice, obviously the rules and laws over our portion of
the universe are very fixed and rigid ... although in some far flung
corner they may differ ... only God would know, at this time.

But, as to Einstein, we have watched quacks hunt and attempt to
interpret, expand, etc. his words to allow various "fudge factors" which
he never intended ... usually with attempts to move discussions into
religious areas and begin debate on such books as the bible ... most
always the sign of the unethical and immature.

Nice attempt to waffle (plus interesting snippage of the
context). Do you agree that Einstein wasn't referring to an
actual deity, or not? And do you agree that his use of the
term "ether" (which was the context you snipped) referred to
something other than the sort of physical "ether" refuted by
Michaelson and Morley, or not?

Diety? Same circle? Again? Isn't "deity" the equivalent of "God?"

You are a compete loon whose absorption with religion has driven you nuts!

Einstein acknowledges a creator, I don't see much difference between the
powers of a creator and the powers of a God (or, deity, for that
matter), as far as the difference in powers/abilities go, I have no
interest. It just has NO bearing on the discussion of hard physics.

Now, as to external beliefs in the interactions of such a creator or God
with humans, A RELIGION, I don't care of your relationship, nor, even if
you have one, real or false, or not! And, what the hell powers you
ascribe to "God", or not, matters not, to me or this discussion -- but
here your moronic text keeps circling!

You jump in here with a total focus on matters of religion (bible,
Jesus, catholic, jew, etc., etc., etc.) and attempt every trick you can
to put words into someones mouth, attempt to determine what religious
beliefs they have, etc., and even go so are as to postulate that this is
valid in what we were chatting about before you stuck your
religious-focused-arse in here!

Gee, do we see that strawman arguments are your weapon of choice? ROFLOL

In any public forum I have entered, you would be thrown out on your
religious focused arse! It is generally accepted only morons would be
so crass and full-of-themselves, and that you would BE EXPECTED to
holster your personal beliefs and rants from such ... and carry on in a
sane manner with the use of logic.

How many times must you be told that religious arguments are immaterial
here? That your belief, or not, in a personal God has NO relevance
here, nor anyone elses'!

You are the only one who is unaware of your insanity, or the delusion
that your actions are not insane, fix it!

How are you now attempting to bend what I have stated? The ether will
have the properties we find, when we are able to find them ...

The Michaelson-Morley experiment assumed that the earth rotation and
properties who NOT influence their experiment, I pointed out that there
is good reason that is false, and that their experiment may have failed
from its' very design, re-look at the SHORT text of the URL I gave you,
it is not overwhelming!

If you are a child, grow-up, if you are that petty an adult, GIVE UP!

You need to maintain focus on the proofs you have to offer, and the lack
of them, and not depend on religion and personal attacks to prove your
logic and reason ... if you have no experts, no scholars, no scientists
which hold your beliefs, and have put their works to paper, provide your
own paper!

Do something other than maintaining a focus on religion, personal
opinions, guesses, visions, rants, personal attacks, strawman arguments,
etc.

Regards,
JS


--

Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry