On 2011-06-07 14:09, John Smith wrote:
On 6/7/2011 10:31 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:

...
Perhaps you should read his words again so you could begin
to understand that the "gravitational ether" was a
convenient way to think of the deformation of spacetime by
matter and energy, not a physical medium such as was
demonstrated to be nonexistent by Michaelson and Morley (and
others). And this is neither a tangent nor a circle; it's
the heart of the matter.

Einstein considers it un-ponderable, he claims to NOT understand the
properties of ether, he indicates, at this present time, we can attempt
to observe how in "interacts" with our matter to deduce its' properties.

However, without a doubt, its' ability to support the propagation of
light (and therefore RF) is a given fact ...

You simply attempt to stick your ideas, visions, opinion of what ether
is and have Einstein take the blame for it.

And, an excellent example of the tangents and circle you navigate with
your spin-doctoring ...

It is both my opinion and observation that there is some kinda of
interaction with ether and metal antennas (and other conductive
substances, elements.) It is here that RF "rings" the ether and begins
the propagation of the RF wave/particles ... the experts approach this
is a much more subtle manner than the words I choose.

I'll nominate you for a Nobel Prize in physics for 2012.

You just proved, without a doubt, that satellite TV and GPS receivers do
not work as advertised!

Bravo!