On Jun 1, 9:21*am, Iarnrod wrote:
On Jun 1, 6:23*am, joeturn wrote:





On May 29, wrote:

On May 29, 3:42*pm, joeturn wrote:

On May 27, wrote:

On May 27, 12:52*am, joeturn wrote:

On May 26, wrote:

On May 26, 5:04*pm, joeturn wrote:

On May 26, 6:54*pm, RD Sandman wrote:

joeturn wrote :

On May 26, 2:00*pm, RD Sandman wrote:
joeturn wrote
innews:19a9de4c-4b15-4cd9-9890-604d
:

Actually I'm complaining just like you,Just think I could have
made that extra 100 pionts making it say 245 if I had taken the
test,while not being over-medicatedI;-)

And it would be even more bull**** than your claim of 145.

You could not excess my link or are you ashamed to post your score?
I think my IQ is higher than your bowling score! Even if it was a
spelling test you could not get any higher than 100 which is
average for the majority.I;-)

Whatever.....don't you understand that on the internet everyone is 6'
5", weighs 245lbs and has an IQ over 145?

Soo post your link so we can tell how tall you are!

5' 9" or would you prefer 6' 5"?

--
Sleep well tonight....RD (The Sandman)

If you woke up this morning....
Don't complain.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

No that would be allowing your word to be a reliable source..Surely you
can out score me Im a kook and mentally chalenged with an altered
state of mind. Let your mommy read it for you,you can just take a wild
guess if she gets stumped on a hard question.Its multiple choice and
you should be able to guess your way into the limelight!.

Stop sniffing glue, kooktard.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You have not solved this crime after I told you what happened!

WrognTurnJoe, YOU don't tell peopel what happened. YOU tell people
what the kooky voices in your head tell you to say!

Hint: Your claims are physically impossible; the official findings
resolve every question, the FACT that you cannot NAME ONE THING in the
NIST report that is incorrect shows you are an idiot.

So you name one thing that was not correct in the NIST report

HEY WrongTurnJoe, you MORON: NOTHING is incorrect in the NIST report.
Your continuing inability to NAME ONE THING proves that.

*and
claim your not the IDIOT.Failure to do soo after you have been shown
several inconsistances in the NIST report

You HAVE NOT NAMED ONE THING that is inconsistent in the NIST report.
Not a one.

puts your intelect in
jeopardy.Fact is is that its by far harder to find just one thing that
is not a lie in the NIST report!

Then NAME ONE, moron. YOU CAN'T AND YOU WON'T!!

BWAHAAAAAHAHAHAAHAHA!!

You have 30 seconds to prove your not the idiot, GO!

Done and done. Your constant illiteracy and lack of reasoning skills
and your ignorance of basic physics exposes you.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So you name one thing that was correct in the NIST report and
claim your not the IDIOT.

Poor poor WrongTurnJoe!! STILL failing to understand the nature of his
task!!

Joey, YOU are the *one who is supposed to NAME ONE THING in the NIST
report that you "think" is wrong. So far, across these many months and
years, you have been utterly INCAPABLE of doing so. The fact is,
EVERYTHING in the NIST report is verified TRUTH and CORRECT, and this
is why you continue to RUN AWAY from your challenge! Too funny! But we
knew you would.

Failure to do soo after you have been shown
several inconsistances in the NIST report puts your intelect in
jeopardy.

OH THE ****IN' IRONY!! "Intelect?" BWAHAAHAAHAAAAHAHAHAHAA!!
"Inconsistances?" BWAWWWAHAAAAAAHAAAAHAAAAHHAAA!!! "Soo?"
BWAHAAAHAAAHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAAAA!!!

Joey, I think you've been missing your ride on the short bus!

Hint: You have not yet shown ANY inconsistency at all. None. FAIL.

Now let's all watch WrongTurnJoe RUN AWAY AGAIN!!

Mighty Iarnrod correctly predicts WrongTurnJoe will once again FAIL to
NAME ONe THING!!- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

There is a never ending list of things NIST got wrong in their
Government paid for 911 commission report! Here is just one!

They said after listening to tapes where

the audible level was dubed.That the elevation of noise was not loud
enough for an explotion large enough to bring down the twin towers!

Why was such an explanation entered into their report,when they saw
with their own eyes that there were multiple explotions throughout the
buildings
going off at a timed sequence,taking out the support columns.They saw
it was not the work of a single explotion but the result of multiple
explotions.

Thermate cutter charges are noted for their demolition properties not
their loudness.They knew the charges were built into the buildings
during their construction and had to see they were utilized during the
demolition of all three towers!

This NIST report got Rudi's insider trading a mega insurance claim,it
herded the sheeples attention away from asbestos lawsuits and
concieled their governments connection to the mass murder!

Want me to list another lie NIST presented to the world for
pacification?