On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 16:04:12 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by John Smith :

On 6/8/2011 3:19 PM, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:16:02 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by John :

On 6/7/2011 10:48 AM, Bob Casanova wrote:

...
Diety? Same circle? Again? Isn't "deity" the equivalent of "God?"

Is it? Is Thor "God"? How about Shiva? Zeus?

Do you wish to purchase a clue?

snip transference idiocy

Again, I tied "deity" to "creator" and "God", and took it for granted I
would be speaking who are rooted in reality ...

Reality is the belief by millions, past and present, in the
existence of thousands of deities, most whom aren't referred
to as "God". Language isn't your first language, is it?

I guess it isn't.

If the set of false-pseudo-deities are thrown in, we are back again to
your attempting to go out on tangents and run back to the same religious
focus at the center of most of your post ...

Wiggle, wiggle, wiggle...

As always, the "God" is the creator which we were discussing

We weren't discussing a creator. We were discussing the
propagation of EM radiation in a vacuum, and Einstein's lack
of belief in a personal deity. HTH.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless