On Jun 16, 7:19*pm, Government Shill #2 wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:26:56 -0400, BDK wrote:
In article 7869df2d-bcbc-41d0-bed3-d190b7f45024
, says...

On Jun 16, 8:51 am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 15, 2:06 pm, Government Shill #2 wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT), george wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:42 am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously
you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have
uncovered.

Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he
thinks. Too bad I don't.

I see that you still quote dead people

McCoy is dead? Cite?

, perhaps because they can't
refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler
appreciated redneck folks like yourself.

I see that you still refuse to provide any requested
information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms
and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your
choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

If I posted a link or cite to the holy grail, you'd find a way of
disqualifying it.

Can you or BDK prove or document to me that either of you have ever
helped another soul on Earth?

Decoder ring time here.
WTF is he on about

A standard decoder ring won't work. This is High Babblelooonian. You need a
Guth-o-mat 9000 Babble Decoder for Brad's stuff.

Did that FUD-master brain fart smell as good as it felt?

Did babble FUD-babble babble babble babble babble babble? [brown
smell]

Damn! Now my Guth-o-mat 9000 has packed it in.

Shill #2

The 9000 is garbage, the 9100 is better, but you can't enter more than a
couple of sentences, or it starts to overload.

If I can get another ALL CAPs bonus from |-|erc, I'm going to put a down payment
on a Guth-o-mat Ultimate Deluxe. That should fix it.

No. By the time that happens guths one lonely brain cell will have
given up the ghost