July 3rd 11, 07:48 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|
external usenet poster
|
|
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,027
|
|
Obama may be in deep trouble… Chief Justice John Roberts, U.S. Supreme Court
On Jul 2, 10:11*pm, John Smith wrote:
http://redwhitebluenews.com/?p=7581
The whole article, he
By Rebel Rouser from Texas
According to sources who watch the inner workings of the federal
government, a smackdown of Barack Obama by the U.S. Supreme Court may be
inevitable. Ever since Obama assumed the office of President, critics
have hammered him on a number of Constitutional issues.
Critics have complained that much, if not all of Obama s major
initiatives run headlong into Constitutional roadblocks on the power of
the federal government.
Obama certainly did not help himself in the eyes of the Court when he
used the venue of the State of the Union address early in the year to
publicly flog the Court over its ruling that the First Amendment grants
the right to various organizations to run political ads during the time
of an election.
The tongue-lashing clearly did not sit well with the Court, as
demonstrated by Justice Sam Alito, who publicly shook his head and
stated under his breath, That s not true, when Obama told a flat-out
lie concerning the Court s ruling.
As it has turned out, this was a watershed moment in the relationship
between the executive and the judicial branches of the federal
government. Obama publicly declared war on the court, even as he
blatantly continued to propose legislation that flies in the face of
every known Constitutional principle upon which this nation has stood
for over 200 years.
Obama has even identified Chief Justice John Roberts as his number one
enemy, that is, apart from Fox News and Rush Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity,
and so on.
And it is no accident that the one swing-vote on the court, Justice
Anthony Kennedy, stated recently that he has no intention of retiring
until Obama is gone.
Apparently, the Court has had enough.
The Roberts Court has signaled, in a very subtle manner, of course, that
it intends to address the issues about which Obama critics have been
screaming to high heaven.
A ruling against Obama on any one of these important issues could
potentially cripple the Administration.
Such a thing would be long overdue.
First, there is ObamaCare, which violates the Constitutional principle
barring the federal government from forcing citizens to purchase something.
And no, this is not the same thing as states requiring drivers to
purchase car insurance, as some of the intellectually-impaired claim.
The Constitution limits FEDERAL government, not state governments, from
such things, and further, not everyone has to drive, and thus, a citizen
could opt not to purchase car insurance by simply deciding not to drive
a vehicle.
In the ObamaCare world, however, no citizen can opt out.
Second, sources state that the Roberts court has quietly accepted
information concerning discrepancies in Obama s history that raise
serious questions about his eligibility for the office of President.
The charge goes far beyond the birth certificate issue. *This
information involves possible fraudulent use of a Social Security number
in Connecticut, while Obama was a high school student in Hawaii.
And that is only the tip of the iceberg.
Third, several cases involving possible criminal activity, conflicts of
interest, and pay-for-play cronyism could potentially land many
Administration officials, if not Obama himself, in hot water with the Court.
|