On Jul 8, 4:46*am, "Scout"
wrote:
"Iarnrod" wrote in message

...

On Jul 2, 3:59 pm, John Smith wrote:
usual delusional racist blather

Hint: It is a complete impossibility for the birth certificate to be
fraudulent, you ****witted KQQK. Hawaii issued it... that by very
definition makes it TRUE AND CORRECT.

Case closed.

That's an interesting position.

And a correct and dispositive one.

I recall a few years ago a individual in the NJ government was entering
improper data into the birth certificate records database, then illegal
aliens would show up asking to get their "birth certificate" which the clerk
would check the records, find the data entered, and happily issue a
certified copy of a Birth Certificate that didn't' exist, except in the
computer on fraudulent data.

Nothing to do with this case. Hawaii released the original record
filed in 1961.

So tell me, NJ issued those birth certificates, where they True and Correct?

No because unlike Obama's they did not reflect the original record.

Why is it Hawaii can't seem to find the original?

Umm, who said it couldn't find it? It did and released it. Case is
closed, fuzznuts.

Why is it there is a serious question about the registration number that
shows up on the document Obama has produced?

There is no such question.

Seems to me given the irregularities that further investigation is warranted
if only due to his security clearances.

Seems to me you're full of **** as usual. Your denial does not create
a real doubt about the document, but about your sanity,

Certainly such would occur with
anyone else obtaining or holding a TS clearance should such irregularities
arise.

No, it would do no such thing. The state certification would be
accepted.

So why is he "special"?

He is "special" in the historical sense that he made history by being
the first and only presidential candidate in US history ever to
actually document through his birth certificate that he meets the
natural born citizen requirement. Case closed.