View Single Post
  #8   Report Post  
Old July 15th 11, 07:20 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Richard Clark Richard Clark is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Anybody following the Dallas Files

On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:31:17 -0500, amdx wrote:

Sounds like you didn't look at the site so "what is left unsaid."


Hi Mike,

As I said, nothing there but a vague suggestion of the topic heavily
cloaked in an admonition.

Yes, I'm looking a steerable receive only arrays for the AM broadcast
band. Myself, I want one that will fit on a 150ft lot.


Is that 150' on a side? 150' long?

There are any number of ways to construct variable delay lines. A
little bit of computer control will pull their outputs together to
form beam steering.

Planting the antennas is simple and allows for testing of any of those
many ways to construct variable delay lines. Those designs themselves
have various trade-offs for issues you need to prioritize and
pronounce. The antennas don't need to be in any particular, regular
pattern as that would be accommodated by computer alignment.

If you choose to go manual steering, with analog variable delay line
designs; then, yes, having a regular pattern of element layout would
reduce complexity.

How many antenna elements? At least three, I would suspect. From
there on it is a matter of how well you can resolve the various delay
angles for steering a broad beam angle. Increase the number of
elements and the beam angle gets progressively tighter. You don't say
how much directionality you want, but it will be intimately correlated
with this count.

The delay lines will have to be tolerant of mutual coupling - better
yet, they should not perturb the existing mutual coupling at all. Good
isolation amplifiers between each element and its delay line before
going to a summing amplifier would seem a solution. Tracking between
delay lines will affect beam width. More elements will require
tighter tracking.

Then there is something simpler, an Adcock Antenna and the Bellini
Tosi Antenna (about 100 years old, but does the job too). There is
the Krug (Wullenweber) antenna. They are all symmetrical designs that
simplified the manual, analog delay lines design.

In the end, they all comprise the same fundamentals. If you cannot
support a symmetrical design, that is your primary limiting factor. If
you can digitize the delay lines, then symmetry can be synthesized and
the antennas can be placed physically anywhere limited only by the
resolution of digital sampling rate.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC