Tube equipment question
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			On Mar 4, 5:48 pm, Mike Coslo  wrote: 
 Solid state transmitters are notoriously finicky about matching to the 
 antenna. Tube equipment is not, so I am told, and early experience seems 
 to bear that out. 
 
I don't know if "finicky" is a good term, Mike.  "Different" might be 
the best word to use.  Transmitters with vacuum tube finals can match 
a wider range as a rule, but there is a limit to what they can 
handle.  Some of the older Johnson and Globe/WRL rigs matched a wider 
range than some of the other brands. 
 
 Certainly I can see one of my newer rigs start to fold back at 2:1. 
 
Most Japanese gear is designed to do just what you're experiencing. 
That's a form of protection for the final transistors.  Ten-Tec does 
it differently.  Ten-Tec rigs do not start to reduce power.  They 
depend upon the supply to fault and trip if too much current is 
drawn.  That's why it is important to use a Ten-Tec supply with them 
or to use a fast breaker rated to trip near the maximum current draw 
expected of the transmitter. 
 
 What are the practical limitations of the Tube finals apparent 
 flexibility? 
 
That depends entirely upon the design specifications set by the 
manufacturer. 
If the manufacturer's manual says "45-90 ohms", that's the practical 
limitation. 
Some of those old Globe transmitters used to have ranges of up to 1000 
or 2000 ohms as I recall.  At the other end of the spectrum, 
Hallicrafters produced some transmitters without even a loading 
control.  These were designed to be used with an antenna presenting 
something very close to 50 or 75 ohms. 
 
 Is it safe to compare the load, plate, and drive controls to some of the 
 functions of a tuner? (possible real dumb question) 
 
Not the "drive" control, but certainly the other controls of a tuner 
could be considered comparable to the "tune" and "load" controls. 
 
If the only antennas we have are trapped verticals, tribanders or 
dipoles/inverted vees cut for the band to be used, we might get away 
with not having to use a tuner at all.  Still there are likely to be 
frequencies significantly removed from the antenna's resonant 
frequency where one might need a tuner to enable the transmitter to 
make full power.  We aren't likely to need a wide range tuner for 
those times.  A simple T-match will likely enable us to find a 
combination of settings which will present a low VSWR to the 
transmitter.  The main alternative is to have a variety of antennas 
which present a VSWR of under 2:1 to a transmitter. 
 
Dave K8MN 
 
		 
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |