"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
36...
Phil Kane wrote in
:

On Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:37:57 CST, "Dee Flint"
wrote:

I didn't explain myself very well on my comments on infrastructure and hams
in emergencies. What I was trying to say was that the smaller disasters
will need hams less and less as the normal infrastructure becomes more
robust despite its complexity. Therefore when the big disasters hit that do
compromise the infrastructure, there will be a lower percentage of people
with training and experience available.

Dee, N8UZE