Phil Kane wrote:
wrote:
2) I would make the exams themselves 'secret', that is, no more
open question pools.
The success of (2) depends on the willingness to prosecute any and all
persons who reveal or possess the contents of any examination without
authorization. Does the name "Dick Bash" ring any bells? It's still
a sore point with me.
The chances of either actually happening range from "none" to "what
world are you on".
You could get the same result, effectively, by increasing the size of
the question pool. Just go from the present 8 or 10 to 1 ratio (pool
size to test size) to something larger. It could be easily accomplished
with the issuance of the next set of pools.
--
Klystron