View Single Post
  #5   Report Post  
Old September 28th 11, 01:51 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,talk.politics.guns,rec.sport.golf,alt.conspiracy
Scout Scout is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2011
Posts: 207
Default Small gun, the serious protection you need ...



"BDK" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:19 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

.410 buck (or a choice), .357/.38 ....

good obama blaster, criminal public servant controller, etc. Could stop
'em from stealing you SW radio, golf clubs, other guns, or save your
arse when you wake up to the conspiracy and the conspirators want you
silenced!

http://bondarmsusa.com/

(make sure you watch the video!)

Would even fit in the san fransicko boys' purses!

Regards,
JS


**** that. This is a much better weapon.

http://www.ruger.com/products/sp101/index.html

Five shots, better reload time, much more accurate.


Leave it to Johnny Kook to pick a POS like a Bond Arms 2 shot.

Dozens of better guns out there.


Depends on what you're after.

On a shot per shot basis, the .410 is going to deliver more to target.

effectively ten 30 caliber pellets to target in the time it takes to pull
the trigger twice.

Whereas the Ruger is going to take 5 trigger pulls, a reload, and than
another 5 trigger pulls.

That's not to say that one is a better gun than the other, but as in so much
it depends on what you're looking for it to do.

Also the .410 loading is generally reported to have a fairly high 1 shot
stop percentage, since you are usually effectively hitting the target
multiple times in 1 shot.

Based on reports and testing, the rounds that produce the best one shot
stops are those that produce a nice hydrostatic shock wave in the blood
pressure that effectively shuts down the brain for a period of time. Now
that's not to say they are going to stay down, only that they are going to
drop on the first shot and stay down for a bit. Shotguns do this quite
effectively since they tend to dump a large part of their energy to a broad
section of the body inducing such a hydrostatic shock. This, of course,
depends upon a reasonably direct impact to center mass.

So it all depends on your preferences, choices, and so on.

My biggest objection would be the weight of the piece which IMO makes it
less of a carry piece. On the other hand it's flat which again IMO makes it
easier to conceal than a revolver.