View Single Post
  #35   Report Post  
Old September 29th 11, 04:08 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,talk.politics.guns,rec.sport.golf,alt.conspiracy
SaPeIsMa SaPeIsMa is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2010
Posts: 83
Default Small gun, the serious protection you need ...


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
On 9/28/2011 4:40 PM, Scout wrote:


wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:30:19 -0400, "Scout"
wrote:



wrote in message
...
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:19 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

.410 buck (or a choice), .357/.38 ....

good obama blaster, criminal public servant controller, etc. Could
stop
'em from stealing you SW radio, golf clubs, other guns, or save your
arse when you wake up to the conspiracy and the conspirators want you
silenced!

http://bondarmsusa.com/

(make sure you watch the video!)

Would even fit in the san fransicko boys' purses!

Regards,
JS

**** that. This is a much better weapon.

http://www.ruger.com/products/sp101/index.html

Five shots,

Which you get from one round of .410 triple aught buck (3" shell)

I can get 5 shots on target. And reload in about 2 seconds.


Get, the .410 can do the same thing in about 50ms, and do it again 50ms
later.



better reload time

Really? You think you can reload the cylinder of that revolver faster
than
you can fire the other barrel of that derringer?

A derringer is an inaccurate piece of junk. Ruger makes an infinately
better gun.


How accurate do you need to be at a typical distance of under 15 feet?

much more accurate.

I suspect the .410 would be suitably accurate for any reasonable self
defense range.

So unless you think you will have time to group your shots, The higher
accuracy is pretty much moot.

.357 or 38 P+ hollowpoints at close range you only need one or two
anyway.


At close rates the typical .410 takes only one.

The other 3 are extra.


Then they really aren't relevant.

The SP101 is truly a remarkably
accurate gun for a snubby.


Which means exactly nothing at close quarters combat since extreme
accuracy isn't a significant factor since you don't take the time to aim
properly anyway.

I can shoot the same size groups with that
as I can with any handguns.


Sure....do you suppose your attacker is going to wait until you get in
position, fix your stance, and line up your sights?




Do you realize you sound very negative here? ROFLOL!


Anyone who does NOT practice "point-shoot" techniques for self-defense is
doing the wrong thing
Self-defense shooting has to be instinctive point shooting.
You will not have time to get into the right position, bring your weapon to
eye-level and aim carefully..
You must literally point your weapon and pull the trigger.
That means practicing regularly UNAIMED shooting at distances under 10 yards