"Scout" wrote in
:



"BDK" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

"BDK" wrote in message
. ..
In article ,
says...

On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:19 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

.410 buck (or a choice), .357/.38 ....

good obama blaster, criminal public servant controller, etc.
Could stop
'em from stealing you SW radio, golf clubs, other guns, or save
your arse when you wake up to the conspiracy and the
conspirators want you silenced!

http://bondarmsusa.com/

(make sure you watch the video!)

Would even fit in the san fransicko boys' purses!

Regards,
JS

**** that. This is a much better weapon.

http://www.ruger.com/products/sp101/index.html

Five shots, better reload time, much more accurate.

Leave it to Johnny Kook to pick a POS like a Bond Arms 2 shot.

Dozens of better guns out there.

Depends on what you're after.

On a shot per shot basis, the .410 is going to deliver more to
target.

effectively ten 30 caliber pellets to target in the time it takes to
pull the trigger twice.

Whereas the Ruger is going to take 5 trigger pulls, a reload, and
than another 5 trigger pulls.

That's not to say that one is a better gun than the other, but as in
so much
it depends on what you're looking for it to do.

Also the .410 loading is generally reported to have a fairly high 1
shot stop percentage, since you are usually effectively hitting the
target multiple times in 1 shot.

Based on reports and testing, the rounds that produce the best one
shot stops are those that produce a nice hydrostatic shock wave in
the blood pressure that effectively shuts down the brain for a
period of time. Now that's not to say they are going to stay down,
only that they are going to
drop on the first shot and stay down for a bit. Shotguns do this
quite effectively since they tend to dump a large part of their
energy to a broad
section of the body inducing such a hydrostatic shock. This, of
course, depends upon a reasonably direct impact to center mass.

So it all depends on your preferences, choices, and so on.

My biggest objection would be the weight of the piece which IMO
makes it less of a carry piece. On the other hand it's flat which
again IMO makes it
easier to conceal than a revolver.


I never understood the whole "weight" thing. A half pound or so more
than a lightweight gun never bothered my at all. I carried a S&W 28
6+ 1/2" at work for 40 hours a week and they don't come a lot heavier
than that. Give me steel always. No plast...er polymer, for me.

All depends on the manner of carry. Weight can be a factor.


Particularly in a poor holster. A good holster tends to negate that
factor.

--
Sleep well tonight,

RD (The Sandman)

WINE - Does not make you FAT....it makes you LEAN....
...against tables, chairs, floors, walls and ugly people...