View Single Post
  #146   Report Post  
Old October 6th 11, 03:08 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,talk.politics.guns,rec.sport.golf,alt.conspiracy
Thomas Heger Thomas Heger is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 48
Default Small gun, the serious protection you need ...

Am 05.10.2011 22:22, schrieb SaPeIsMa:

"Thomas Heger" wrote in message
...
Am 05.10.2011 15:43, schrieb SaPeIsMa:


Not to mention that the Euros have lived with that kind of "specialty"
for far longer than Americans have.
Which is why poor TH is so confused about who is what.

OK. But if you are so happy with the government, what do you need
these 'small guns, the serious protection you need ...' for?


I'm so sorry that you are so myopic
You are making a bunch of stupid presumptions
Who said that:
1) "small guns" are for protection against the government ?
2) "small guns" are NOT useable for protection against the Government ?
3) the government is some "monolithic beast" that can only be addressed
with BIG guns ?
- Government agents are people who may come at you individually OR in
large numbers
4) the government is the ONLY source of threat to individuals
- try criminals as an althernate threat
5) The RKBA is only applicable to "small guns" ?

Ok I don't understand the US society!

If a country has a certain population and has a government and all sorts
of personal, than this personal, employed by the country, should somehow
work for the country - and not against.

A certain individual has a certain job in the large machine of the
society - say a teacher. Than the people pay this person to teach their
kids and that is what the person is supposed to do - no more, no less.

If they employ a policemen, this person should bring some sort of
justice to a district, because the criminals are prosecuted.

That these personal does, what it should, you have laws, that tell these
employees, what to do (and what not).

These laws are figured out by the government, what in some respect
belongs to the personal, too, hence should make just and useful laws
(and nothing else).

If that isn't what happens, but the government tries to threaten the own
population, than we have a lawless situation, where government and its
personal only pretends to work for the people, that pay for them.

If you don't believe, you may read this (or type 'REX 84' into google)
FEMA Concentration Camps:
Locations and Executive Orders
http://www.mindfully.org/Reform/2004...ps3sep04.htm#1

As I said, the Nazis are a dangerous bread.

Btw- the word concentration camp is badly 'germanized' in
"Konzentrationslager" (from the original English roots), because the
German language uses a different linguistic picture, that is more like
the English word 'to collect' for 'sammeln'. In German you would say
"Sammellager" (English: Concentration camp), but not
"Konzentrationslager", because in German to concentrate
("konzentrieren") means to think hard.

So these camps are an Anglo-Saxion speciality and first invented by
Cecil Rhodes.

Anyhow..
Size and location of these camps are a hint, that the intended inmates
are Americans, what I regard as a hint for a not generally trustful
government.