View Single Post
  #6   Report Post  
Old October 7th 11, 09:46 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave,alt.news-media,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.economics,alt.politics.liberalism
[email protected] CB@PrayForMe.com is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2011
Posts: 2
Default OCCUPY THE FED! - A Warning for ‘Occupy Wall Street’

On Thu, 6 Oct 2011 06:27:40 -0700 (PDT), "Chas.Chan"
wrote:

"While I fully endorse the efforts and actions of the Occupy Wall
Street protests, now emerging internationally, there are concerns
which need to be addressed and kept in mind as the movement moves
forward.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oneVFYeMHjU


The Muslim Brotherhood took over the Islamic Spring in Egypt and Libya
and the unintended consequences are 20,000 shoulder rockets missing.

Socialists who 'feel' others owe them something for nothing is being
co-opted by DimocRATs thinking chaos plays into their hands.

Oboobuh to the rescue via Marxism on the heads of those mean, greedy
Bank of America Robber Barons and anyone who makes more money than
this guy...
http://moonbattery.com/occupy_wall_s...otesters_4.jpg

Look what Nancy Pelosi supports in her prayer for God to bless 'them'
http://moonbattery.com/?p=3103




"The process through which a potentially powerful movement may be co-
opted and controlled is slight and subtle. If Occupy Wall Street hopes
to strive for the 99%, it must not submit to the 1%, in any capacity.

"The Occupy movement must prevent what happened to the Tea Party
movement to happen to it. Whatever ideological stance you may have,
the Tea Party movement started as a grass roots movement, largely a
result of anti-Federal Reserve protests. They were quickly co-opted
with philanthropic money and political party endorsements.

"For the Occupy Movement to build up and become a true force for
change, it must avoid and reject the organizational and financial
‘contributions’ of institutions: be they political parties, non-
profits, or philanthropic foundations. The efforts are subtle, but
effective: they seek to organize, professionalize, and
institutionalize a movement, push forward the issues they desire,
which render the movement useless for true liberation, as these are
among the very institutions the movement should be geared against.

"This is not simply about “Wall Street,” this is about POWER. Those
who have power, and those who don’t. When those who have power offer a
hand in your struggle, their other hand holds a dagger. Remain
grassroots, remain decentralized, remain outside and away from party
politics, remain away from financial dependence. Freedom is not merely
in the aim, it’s in the action.

"The true struggle is not left versus right, democrat versus
republican, liberal versus conservative, or libertarian versus
socialist. The true struggle is that of people against the
institution: the State, the banks, the central banking system, the
corporation, the international financial institutions, the military,
the political parties, the mainstream media, philanthropic
foundations, think tanks, university, education, psychiatry, the legal
system, the church, et. al.

[
http://thepeoplesbookproject.com/201...cal-awakening/
]

"The transfer of power from one institution to another does not solve
the crisis of our ‘institutional society,’ whereby a few have come to
dominate so much, to concentrate so much power at the expense of
everyone else having so little. True liberation will result only from
opposition to ‘the institution’ as an entity. Placating power from one
institution to another renders resistance ineffective. The power
structures must be discredited, and power must be distributed to the
people, through voluntary associations, communal groupings, and people-
powered (and people-funded!) initiatives.

[
http://thepeoplesbookproject.com/201...cal-awakening/
]

"In order to survive as a movement, money will become a necessity. Do
not turn to the non-profits and philanthropic foundations for support.
The philanthropies, which fund and created the non-profits and NGOs,
were themselves created to engage in ‘social engineering’: to
‘manufacture consent’ among the governed, and create consensus among
the governors. The philanthropies (particularly those of Carnegie,
Ford, and Rockefeller) fund social movements and protest organizations
so as to steer them into directions which are safe for the elites. The
philanthropies are themselves run by the elite, founded by bankers and
industrialists striving to preserve their place at the top of the
social structure in the midst of potentially revolutionary upheaval.
As the president of the Ford Foundation once said, “Everything the
foundation does is to make the world safe for capitalism.”

[ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/f...asp?fndid=5266
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/f...asp?fndid=5176
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/f...asp?fndid=5210
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/f...asp?fndid=5208
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/f...asp?fndid=5322 ]

"Money from philanthropies will organize the movement into a more
professionalized entity, will direct its efforts around the promotion
of legalistic reform, making slight changes to the system’s symptoms,
promoting particular legislation, rallying around very specific issues
removed from their global historical context. The effect is to turn
anti-system revolutionaries into legalistic reformers. With such
funding, movement organizers are drawn into the world of NGOs,
international conferences, international institutions, aid agencies,
and mainstream political participation. The leaders of the movement
become professionalized and successful, both in prestige and finances.
Thus, their own personal position becomes dependent upon promoting
reform, not revolution; on maintaining the system (with minor changes
to the aesthetic), not moving against it. The movement itself, then,
would be institutionalized.

"For the finances to grow without the threat of institutional
dominance, the money must come from the people. A truly populist cause
could be funded by the people. Keep the people in charge.

"If we truly want freedom and liberation, we must begin to act free
and liberated. If we want the ‘true liberation,’ we must understand
the true system of power that confines, oppresses, segregates,
exploits, impoverishes, and controls us. It is not a matter of the
state or the banks or the corporations. It is a matter of the
institution, itself. The structures of power must be struggled against
so that we may come to liberate humanity from all that confines it,
and experience what our true ‘human nature’ is.

"If one studies mice in a maze, no matter for how long or what the
maze is built of, looks like, feels like, you cannot deduce the nature
of the mouse separate from that of the maze. Break down the maze and
you may observe the true nature of the mouse. We have been living,
always, within a maze. The walls are constructed as institutions which
direct, steer, manipulate, define and segregate us from one another.

"First we must tear down the barriers that bind us from ourselves, and
then we may truly understand what it is to be human and free.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/against-...%e2%80%99.html

http://www.infowars.com/listen-on-the-internet/

Ron Paul: Federal Reserve is why Americans are protesting on Wall St.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/ron-paul...n-wall-st.html

OCCUPY and END THE FED! - Support the Ron Paul Revolution
http://www.RonPaul2012.com/