On 10/27/2011 4:13 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
On 10/26/2011 11:24 AM, SaPeIsMa wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
http://www.infowars.com/feds-order-y...ent-criticism/
Misleading title
It appears that a great many requests were for removal of defamatory
material against individuals due to a court order
I don't consider such removal to be interference with free speech.
Do you ?
Google has a transparency report where requests for removal are
explained
http://www.google.com/transparencyre...nmentrequests/
Yes, when they allow others and pick the ones they don't agree with
for banning, I do! MOST CERTAINLY!
Too bad
Google is NOT the government
The Ist Amendment does NOT apply.
No. They are simply breaking the law by saying one thing and doing yet
another ... I think deception to support
profits/political-interests/etc. can be, and is in some situations,
criminal. But, until it enters a court of law the finer details are
simply an exercise in argument ... it remains to be seen if an when
anything is done about it.
Regards,
JS