On 10/27/2011 2:09 PM, RHF wrote:
On Oct 27, 8:42 am, Thomas wrote:
Am 26.10.2011 15:37, schrieb SaPeIsMa:
"Thomas wrote in message
...
Am 26.10.2011 00:48, schrieb SaPeIsMa:
..
A more recent example would be Catholics and Protestants. Both have
the same roots in Christianity, but they fought bitter and long
lasting wars. Germany was almost completely destroyed and depopulated
through this, even if they were all Christians.
The Catholic-Protestant wars were primarily power, politics and
geo-political control
Religion was just the justification.
R E A L L Y ???
..
Actually circumcision IS a healthy habit.
In an area where water is in short supply, it's far easier to avoid
infection of the penile glans by removing the foreskin.
It's also noted that removing the foreskin also reduces the incidence of
transmitted diseases as well
It's a bad thing - btw - because it changes the appearance of the
human body, that is intended to be as perfect as it is and not as
humans want it to be.
LOL
Tell us about the perfection of the appendix, which an kill you if it
gets inflamed and the ONLY way to avoid being killed by an inflamed
appendix is to excise it.
Well, I think, this practise is intentional altering of the human body.
I do not really like it. Its like piercing or tattoos, what I don't like
neither.
But people may do what they like.
Another question is, what you do with your kids, since these cannot
defend themselves. Early childhood traumata of any sort are generally
unhealthy.
..
When the Christians rejected him, he started his own cult, a big part of
which is to kill just about anyone both inside and outside of his cult.
The COMPLETE ANTITHESIS of Christianity..
Actually the Christians killed a few people, too. They really love to
kill: Muslims, Indians, Africans, each other ...
YOU need to read up on history and do a body count
Compared to the Muslims, the only group that has killed a larger number
of people are the Communists.
Communism is a bad thing in my eyes and closely related to fascism.
- Personally I think, that fascism and
- communism are two sides of the same coin.
International Socialism {Communism} and
National Socialism : Both have their roots
in 'Socialism'.
.
Both - btw- have roots in London. Marx and Engels lived there.
The Brits supported the communists and are themself responsible for a
few massacres. But I even think, the Brits supported the Nazis, too.
Hitler could possibly be a kind of 'British spy'. The entire story of
the so called third Reich is more than dubious. Most likely its all fake
and crime. But I cannot tell anything for sure.
I usually follow ideas and inspirations, then research, read, look at
old pictures or films.
Usually I try to find inconsistencies. One of these was a 'storm belt'
over the wrong shoulder - on a person that opens the door of a car for
Hitler. This means, the film is reverted and left and right exchanged.
Possibly to hide the fact, that the car was designed to drive on the
left side.
TH
I tend to see true socialism as reflecting the way of the American
Indians tribes model(s.) The tribe shares in the work of the tribe, the
problems of the tribe, the solutions of the tribe, the assets of the
tribe, etc. They are banded together for the betterment of each and
every member and the tribe as a whole. While that may, or may not, mean
each and everyone has "exactly the same" as any other, it does imply
they have equal rights and that a minimum of help and support is granted
to any and every single member of that tribe ...
Indeed, without socialism, the human race could never have progressed to
the point of where we stand today ... communism is certainly a vastly
differing system, as is capitalism.
No matter what title you give to an elite group stealing all the others
creator granted resources and then using these resources to enslave
others, it only looks criminal from a distance. Indeed, communists
often accuse capitalists of the same crimes which capitalists are
accusing communists of ... stealing others resources to enrich
themselves ... and those accusations being made on the rich elite
group(s) which tend to have dominance over the other members of the society.
The best, and perhaps the only way to be able to picture this, is from
the 3rd person perspective. Or, say you are an alien arriving in a
spaceship and meet bill gates standing beside a minimum wage earner, or
worse, a starving child, and asking yourself, "Why is that a proper form
and model for a society to follow?"
Regards,
JS