On 1/21/2012 1:46 AM, hwh wrote:
On 1/21/12 12:59 AM, sms88 wrote:
The mistake many people make is trying to claim that just because the
audio is perceived as near CD quality by listeners

The mistake you make is to lie about the sound quality. All these
'tests' you are talking about are rigged by the industry, as has been
described in detail on the group recently.

Sorry, no one has provided any evidence to show that to be the case. It
may be something that they desperately want to believe, since as you've
seen some people will fall for anything (witness the claims of HD
interference caused by a central valley AM station which does not even
broadcast in HD).