On 1/23/12 13:27 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 1/20/12 15:23 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 1/17/12 01:03 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in message
...
On 1/16/12 15:30 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
"D. Peter wrote in
message ...
On 1/16/12 11:35 , FarsWatch4 wrote:
"Phil
wrote in message
...


On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 01:55:32 -0500, "FarsWatch4"
wrote:

9 out of 10 doctors also recommended
cigarette
smoking to
aid and improve digestion.

Where is this study?

This was highly touted in advertising during
the 1940s.

It was an advertising ploy. Not a study, per
se.

I hope we can tell the difference.

Insult aside, it WAS indeed based on surveys.

A survey designed by an advertising company....again,
I hope
you can
tell the difference.



Insult aside, it was a survey designed by the Tobacco
Industry.

Yes it was.

It was a survey designed by the business its
conclusion
supported.

Yes it was.

The results were used to promote sales the industry's
products.

Yes it was.

Not unlike iBiquity designing and sponsoring surveys
the
results
of which supports sales of its products.

The surveys I have seen were not designed nor sponsored
by iBiquity...but were seperate research projects done by
stations themselves by
hiring
outside research companies with no stake in the outcome.


As someone who participated in the execution of several
such surveys,
that is simply not true.

You mean you couldn't tell when you were being snookered into
an advertising campain?


Ah, so you admit that the HD surveys are just an advertising
scheme....thank you for finally admitting the truth.

Nope. I'm saying I can tell the difference between an
advertising
campagn
and scientific research..

As someone who works on both,...I'd say, "yes."