On Mar 13, 1:03*pm, Steve wrote:
On Mar 13, 4:42*am, dxAce wrote:









radiodavid wrote:
On Mar 12, 2:06 pm, dxAce wrote:
radiodavid wrote:
As usual, you prefer the ad hominems to recognizing a 60-year-old
fact: AM/MW verifications of reception are called "veries" and the
term "QSL" was used far, far, far, less historically.

So? You're still a clown 'tard, boy. Now get your sorry ass back to your old schtick
of being 'Eduardo'.

You have a hard time addressing any subject that puts you under
scrutiny. MW verifications in North America have been "veries" for 7
decades... and you still deny it.

You're a clown 'tard... and you still deny it.

Run along, 'Eduardo'.

"Eduardo" was away all this time and yet he never got "it" out of his
system. That is brutally sad. I don't care how big of an asshole he
is, he deserves broader horizons, bigger thoughts and a better life
than that.

I just noticed that Michigan's Unibummer still had the "verie"
reference in his signature when it came up in an unrelated search. I
found it amusing that he's still making fun of the entire AM DX
community by ridiculing their standard term for verifications of
reception.

I had moved on (as most former SW listeners have)... but DX Ass
continues to obsess about this and totally refuses to look at all the
evidence.