Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Rob" napisa? w wiadomo?ci
...

snip

I know that it is not true.
A transmitter needs no infinite source or sink for charge because it
does not generate any DC current into the antenna.

It is true because it generate the oscillatory flow of electrons into the
antenna.

Meaningless babble; there is no such thing.

In such case the DC ammeter idicates the current.

What DE ammeter?

Ok so we can finally rest the case and agree that a connection to
earth is not required for a transmitter, something you have claimed
all the time because Marconi wrote it.

Marconi wrote:
""By "connected to earth" I do not necessarily mean an ordinary metallic
connection as used for ordinary wire telegraphs.
The earth wire may have a condenser in series with it, or it may be
connected to what is really equivalent, a capacity area placed close to the
surface
of the ground (Fig. 4)."

" a capacity area placed close to the surface of the ground" = " large
conductor "

The case will be ready to rest if you admit that Marconi was right in his
Nobel lecture.

Marconi was wrong.

Get over it.