"Ian White, G3SEK" wrote in message
...
R J Carpenter wrote:
"Ian White, G3SEK" wrote in message
...
Gregg wrote:
Behold, Tim Wescott signalled from keyed 4-1000A filament:
There's just not enough VHF homebrew out there!
IMHO, we can thank that no-code licence that restricts you to
commercially-made equipment for this.
There is actually a lot of HB associated with VHF, but the effort just
doesn't happen to go into building QRP transceivers.
Code proficiency is totally irrelevant to that. Some of this country's
most advanced VHF homebrewers have held a no-code licence for over 30
years. The same is true in Germany, France and several other European
countries.
Ah, but according to his URL Greg is in Canada, where IIRC the no-code
licence does NOT allow homebrew transmitters.
But code proficiency still doesn't come into it, at all.
Yes and no. Agreed, code proficiency is not related to the ABILITY to do
homebrew.
If, as I think is true , the authorities (Canadian) forbid you to use a
homebrew transmitter with a no-code licence, it is wrong to say that code
proficiency doesn't come into it. OK, you could build the transmitter, but
it would be illegal to use it. As an aside, I wonder what happens to a US
no-code ham with a homebrew transmitter who operates in Canada....
73 de bob w3otc
|