On 12/21/2012 4:58 PM, rickman wrote:
On 12/21/2012 7:06 AM, Lord Infomouse wrote:
On 12/20/2012 10:36 AM, Truth and honesty wrote:

Really what terms would Hitler have accepted to end the war?

I like how this guy asks me a pointed question and then disappears when
I answer. True grit and high-caliber tactics.

If I had ten divisions of those men, then our troubles here would be
over very quickly.


You talk a lot but don't say much...

Rick

It's because you are a stupid idiot and are not familiar with my debate
style. For me, getting to the facts is more important than being right.
You humans get on top of a side or position and ride it all the way to
oblivion, never wavering and never changing, even when the facts
completely obliterate your argument. I, on the other hand, do not mind
playing Devil's Advocate. It is apparent in this discussion that by
suppressing viewpoints, such as any support at all for any Axis power,
you have laid yourself bare to anyone supporting them. You have no
antibodies to fight such an assault because you allow no one to speak of
it, and suppress it even though it is free speech, because it makes you
grumpy and unhappy that there might be an enemy position.

So, wave your hands, and condemn the Axis as everything that is totally
gruesomely evil and inhuman, and slowly but surely, in your inability to
consider grey areas, they creep up and suffocate you in your comfortable
little bed where you are happy like a clam and innocent in every way.

--
Who told you to think?
I don't give you enough
information to think.
You do what you're told, that's what you do.