View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 18th 14, 04:17 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Brian Reay[_5_] Brian Reay[_5_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 393
Default The "Two Transistor challenge" - taking things a bit too far?

On 18/02/14 15:21, Phi wrote:
I paid about £180 for an HP35 in 1973, this calculator used reverse
polish notation (no equals key).

That seems cheap for an HP at the time. As I recall, that was the launch
price of the Sinclair, although it soon dropped.

The Sinclair was also RPN, as were the early Texas calculators I think.
Sinclair lacked the "Enter" button, using the + key its place.

For the 'everyday' user, RPN was not popular and calculators offering,
almost, algebraic, entry became more popular. I think the first
calculator to offer true algebraic entry (ie following BODMAS/BIDMAS
convention) was Texas. Even today some cheap calculators don't follow
the convention. One of the many things I warn pupils of when I teach
calculator use.