View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Old February 18th 14, 08:21 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
Brian Howie Brian Howie is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 112
Default The "Two Transistor challenge" - taking things a bit too far?

In message , Brian Reay writes
On 18/02/14 15:21, Phi wrote:
I paid about £180 for an HP35 in 1973, this calculator used reverse
polish notation (no equals key).

That seems cheap for an HP at the time. As I recall, that was the
launch price of the Sinclair, although it soon dropped.

The Sinclair was also RPN, as were the early Texas calculators I think.
Sinclair lacked the "Enter" button, using the + key its place.

For the 'everyday' user, RPN was not popular and calculators offering,
almost, algebraic, entry became more popular. I think the first
calculator to offer true algebraic entry (ie following BODMAS/BIDMAS
convention) was Texas. Even today some cheap calculators don't follow
the convention. One of the many things I warn pupils of when I teach
calculator use.


I used a National Semiconductor 4640 RPN calculator for about 30 years.
So much so that I can't use a "normal" calculator. I've still got it but
it needs the charger socket and the batteries replaced.

RPN can't be beat for long chain calculations.

My Window desktop calculator is RPN

http://excalibur.en.softonic.com/

Brian
--
Brian Howie