Thread: Antenna article
View Single Post
  #9   Report Post  
Old February 19th 14, 04:08 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jeff Liebermann[_2_] Jeff Liebermann[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,336
Default Antenna article

On Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:04:16 -0500, Fred McKenzie
wrote:

In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote:


I hate to admit it, but I think I've built them backwards over the
years. Maybe that's why J-poles have such a lousy reputation and why
I think they suck?


Please pardon my ignorance. I understood that a J-Pole is a half wave
antenna connected to a quarter wave stub. The transmission line is
connected to a low impedance point (50 Ohms?) on the stub.


Yep, something like that.

In the literature, it is usually fed as an unbalanced antenna, but it is
not. Therefore, it should not matter which side has the center
conductor or shield - they are both wrong!

Fred
K4DII


Well, if it really were a balanced feed, I guess(tm) there should be
no difference in the pattern, gain, VSWR, etc between the two
unbalanced methods of feeding the antenna. Yet the author of the
original article shows large differences in the antenna models. See
Pg 10 thru 13:
http://www.cvarc.org/tech/antenna_myths/antenna_myths.pdf

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558