Thread
:
Radials
View Single Post
#
16
April 2nd 14, 07:25 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Ian Jackson[_2_]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2007
Posts: 568
Radials
In message ,
writes
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message ,
writes
The ideal radial length for ANY ground plane antenna is slightly longer
than 1/4 wavelength, no matter for what frequencey.
Why is this? I would have thought that a 1/4 wave would be best, as it
offers the lowest impedance.
First you have to define what "best" means.
Yebbut ........
You've just said "the ideal radial length for ANY ground plane antenna
is slightly longer than 1/4 wavelength, no matter for what frequency". I
assumed that "ideal" = "best".
..
All antennas are a trade off for impedance, bandwidth, gain and in most
cases physical ability to build the structure.
Changing the radial length will have a small effect on impdedance and resonant
point but changing the radial angle will have a bigger effect on impedance
and a very small effect on resonant point.
True - but what's the angle of the radials got to do with their length?
I would suggest downloading the demo version of EZNEC and modeling a GP to
see what small changes in various parameters do.
I had presumed you had already do this (or something similar) in order
to say that slightly longer than a 1/4 wavelength was ideal. However, I
have always assumed that the steeper the angle of the radials, the more
the groundplane becomes like a vertical halfwave dipole - and the lower
becomes the angle of radiation.
--
Ian
Reply With Quote
Ian Jackson[_2_]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Ian Jackson[_2_]