View Single Post
  #78   Report Post  
Old June 28th 14, 11:22 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
[email protected][_2_] jfeng@my-deja.com[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2007
Posts: 153
Default What goes around...

On Saturday, June 28, 2014 12:50:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/27/2014 9:19 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:49:33 PM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
You find bits and pieces in the Federalist Papers, not a pure
definition.

Show me. I did not see it at all in the quote you provided.

Read it again, I did show you.

I did re-read it. I only see a angument for preventing influence by foreign powers, and there is nothing here saying that this goal would be guaranteed by requiring natural-born citizenship, much less deifining what that would be.

The question posed by Joe from Kokomo was "Does anyone have a *definitive* answer? " and the answer from Rocky the Rat was "Yes, the US Constitution. And the Federalist Papers." You may have different expectations, but I think a definitive anwer should be direct, precise and concise, not scattered and inferential.