RadioBanter - View Single Post

Bill Davis · June 29th 14, 07:16 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave

On 6/28/2014 4:22 PM, wrote:
On Saturday, June 28, 2014 12:50:35 PM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
On 6/27/2014 9:19 AM, wrote:
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:49:33 PM UTC-7, Bill Davis wrote:
You find bits and pieces in the Federalist Papers, not a pure
definition.
Show me. I did not see it at all in the quote you provided.

Read it again, I did show you.
I did re-read it. I only see a angument for preventing influence by foreign powers, and there is nothing here saying that this goal would be guaranteed by requiring natural-born citizenship, much less deifining what that would be.

The question posed by Joe from Kokomo was "Does anyone have a *definitive* answer? " and the answer from Rocky the Rat was "Yes, the US Constitution. And the Federalist Papers." You may have different expectations, but I think a definitive anwer should be direct, precise and concise, not scattered and inferential.

But that is the nature of the Papers and also the Constitution.

It makes checks and balances the keeper of the truth.