Thread: USA HR-4969
View Single Post
  #22   Report Post  
Old August 20th 14, 01:22 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.moderated
Phil Kane Phil Kane is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 300
Default USA HR-4969

On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 17:28:56 EDT, Foxs Mercantile
wrote:

Ok, I'm a little unclear on the concept here.
What is your basis for knowing violating the terms on a
contract you signed?


For a contract term to be valid and enforceable, it must, among other
things, be clear, be reasonable, not contrary to public policy, and
the contract cannot be a "contract of adhesion" where the affected
party has no other choice but to accept the terms rather than
negotiate them.

Does that sound familiar?

73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane
ARRL Volunteer Counsel