Thread: OK, let's discuss dipoles vs length
View Single Post
  #123   Report Post  
Old October 13th 14, 11:03 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle Jerry Stuckle is offline
external usenet poster
  
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
Default OK, let's discuss dipoles vs length
On 10/13/2014 4:02 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

snip

You didn't say "optimum". You said it was "crap". What part of "crap"
don't you understand?

I will not engage in a ****ing contest with you.


You're the one who said it, not me.

You think an NEC analysis is the slickest thing since snot on a
doorknob. But what about HAAT or ground conductivity, for instance?

What about it?


Both have effects on the radiation pattern of an antenna.

Feel free to include all the above in your analysis.

You have considered neither when telling me my antenna was "crap" -
which it provably was not.

Where is the data that proves that?



Easy. The QSL card from Alaska and Hawaii on 75 meters.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================
Reply With QuoteReply With Quote