RadioBanter - View Single Post

Jerry Stuckle · October 14th 14, 01:41 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna

On 10/13/2014 5:46 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 10/13/2014 4:02 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:

snip

You didn't say "optimum". You said it was "crap". What part of "crap"
don't you understand?

I will not engage in a ****ing contest with you.

You're the one who said it, not me.

I will not engage in a ****ing contest with you.

Because you know you're full of crap.

You think an NEC analysis is the slickest thing since snot on a
doorknob. But what about HAAT or ground conductivity, for instance?

What about it?

Both have effects on the radiation pattern of an antenna.

Yes, they do, so feel free to include all the above in your analysis.

You made the statement - not me.

Feel free to include all the above in your analysis.

You have considered neither when telling me my antenna was "crap" -
which it provably was not.

Where is the data that proves that?

Easy. The QSL card from Alaska and Hawaii on 75 meters.

ROFL.

So now you're calling me a liar? You, who don't even have a license and
won't use your real name?

You probably think 75 meters is the depth of your city swimming pool.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================