"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
That is 'normal' for him.

Untrue.

Sometimes he will post a non-abusive post of his
victim and totally misrepresent its content.

Untrue.

He fabricates abuse/insults
against himself as a justification for his own tirades of abuse.

Untrue. Perhaps you are confused by your own remarks about sheep,
methylated spirit, special brew, Asperger's Syndrome and lavatory cleaning,
topping it all with how easy it was to wind up some people, like shooting
rats in a barrel?

He also
fabricates stories about people

Untrue

for example I have never been dismissed,
left a company on bad terms, or even after a short period of employment-
as
he keeps claiming.

Untrue, that information was provided by Stan White G4EGH (Remember? Your
bosom pal whose wife babysat your children until you turned on him as you
turn on all others?) who decribed you
as being in floods of tears down the phone to him when you were terminated.


Nor do I have a brother who is a milkman, or one who has
ever been a milkman.

But your behaviour and language is as one from the working class and
not as one from the degree-educated minority.

Those two show the span of his obsessions.

I've never been obsessed by you; however, I have consistently responded
defensively
to your obsession with me, as evidenced by this and other non-technical
contributions
that you have maed to this thread.

His vendetta against me started

Incorrect. I have never had a vendetta against you, but I have consistently
sought an
apology and retraction from you that my wife is a sheep in the bed next to
me.

after I corrected him on a number of
technical matters,

Untrue. You have never corrected me on anything. True, you have disagreed,
but
that is not the same thing, and I have taken you to task over the personal
remarks
that you make when disagreeing.

I think the first was logs and the dB

I'm sorry, but you are completely wrong in that. In electrical engineering,
the dB
is a unit-free expression of a power ratio.

and of course
there was DSP and his Big K nonsense.

There was no nonsense there, because all the texts, textbooks and URLs to
which I referred said that samplling was a simple multiplication of the
incoming
waveform by the Dirac Delta function, but without there being any factor to
deal
with the obvious anomaly that such a multiplication could only result in
infinitely
high samples. Later on, when working at a DSP company in Bath (picoChip, as
was)
I came across some training material which resolved that anomaly and which
satisfied ny curiosity. (For those interested, the extra factor which must
be included
is a Delta Funcion multiplied by the sampling interval, but that important
factor is missing
from several books on the subject. I suspect that none of the authors,
despite the great
advances they make in the application of DSP don't understand the anomaly,
and skip
over it quickly, probably cribbing off each other's texts)

When you subsequently claimed to have told me of that and were solicited for
the message id
or URL, you went strangely quiet on the matter.

He got even more riled

Untrue, I don't get riled, but you certainly do by this wall of text that
you are seeking
to discredit me.

Perhaps you have revealed more about your own character than you intended,
by
indicating your wish that we should become riled by yor goading?

when he tried
to play the degree card, suggesting only those with a degree should have a
Full Licence.

Sense of humour failure, there, I think, OM?

I'm not quite sure where that would leave his cronies,

Unlike you, with your apprentice in potty-mouthism, I have no cronies. My
opinions are my own. Had you not noticed that I chastised one of those whom
you say are my cronies for mouthing off infantile remarks in your style?

who
couldn't muster a degree between them.

You know nothing about them, for one has a degree in physics, another
a mature student's OU degree.

However, he didn't like being out
bid by someone with two degrees

Completely untrue. Your snobbish posturing about your two of everything,
degrees,
patios, and cars, to name just a few, makes you a source of fun. May I refer
you
to your comment above, "who couldn't muster a degree between them. "?

and his attempt at goading blew up in his
face.

One thing that I have never done in 20 years' of Usenet use is to goad
others,
as do you on a daily basis.

You can verify this in the archive

Untrue. There is no verification possible. HOWEVER, if you review Reay's
posts,
both in this NG and in uk.net.news.config over only the past 24 hours, you
can
see who it is that goads in extremis.