Big G at it again in .antenna
"Stephen Thomas Cole" wrote in message
...
He really doesn't do well with being proven wrong, does he?
The sooner that the good folk of .antenna realise that the best way to
deal
with the drooling moron is to shun him, the sooner that their group will
revert to a place of sanity and accurate physics, as Big G will quickly
move on to upset another group in his search for attention. I reckon he's
about due another stint telling the respected experts in the DSP groups
where they've been going wrong their whole lives.
Why not contribute your own technically based rebuttal instead of
merely reporting here that I have posted there?
Were you unaware of the resistive termination of a Rhombic that is
necessary if you wish it to be uni-directional instead of bi-directional?
A technical response from you would be far better for the health of
amateur radio in general and these NG in particular instead of the
infantile obsession with which you seem to express your envy
of me on a daily basis.
On the matter of seeking attention, as your post above is neither
relevant not technical, I suspect just a teensy-weensy bit that
seeking attention is your emotive maladjustment, and not mine?
|