Thread
:
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
View Single Post
#
7
November 3rd 14, 05:32 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Lamentable ignorance over in Yankland?
rickman wrote:
On 11/2/2014 5:03 PM,
wrote:
Jeefaw K. Effkay wrote:
On 02/11/2014 20:15,
wrote:
The purpose of a transmission line is move RF energy from one place
to another without creating an electromagnetic field.
But a balanced transmission line creates two electromagnetic fields
which cancel one another, Shirley?
What is the value of a canceled check?
If a balanced transmission line created an electromagnetic field, there
would be losses in the line as the line is the only source of energy.
Again neglecting I^2R losses.
Who ever said a balanced transmission line does not create an EM field?
Here is an illustration of the EM field of a transmission line...
https://rdl.train.army.mil/catalog-w...p3.htm#fig3-14
It is an illustration of **** poor wording. What is depicted is NOT an
electromagnetic field, i.e radio waves. It is an illustration of an
electric field and a magnetic field and is correct in that aspect.
It is also from a dumbed down US Army training publication and I can show
you lots of Army manuals that do not conform to accepted principals and
language usage left over from my days as an Army instructor.
--
Jim Pennino
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]