A short 160M antenna
On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:47:36 +1000, atec77 wrote:
On 7/11/2014 9:31 AM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message
...
"John S" wrote in message
...
So, it appears that doubling the length of a short antenna captures
about 3.6 times the signal.
And, therefore, by the reciprocity characteristic, the short antenna
is an inefficient radiator.
So, can I expect an apology from all the Yanks who badmouthed me in
order to try to hide their own ignorance on the matter?
doubtful
you are no matter other mistakes a foolish troll
He's a deeply unpleasant, deliberately disruptive, dunce.
|