Thread
:
The proof of the pudding?
View Single Post
#
7
November 11th 14, 01:55 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
The proof of the pudding?
On 11/10/2014 6:08 PM,
wrote:
rickman wrote:
On 11/10/2014 5:12 PM,
wrote:
gareth wrote:
"Wimpie" wrote in message
...
The reason that you don't need to take magnetic dipole radiation into
account in real mechanical systems is because of the radiated power is
very low (low RPM in practical mechanical systems). Friction
(bearings/air, eddy current, etc) is orders of magnitude more then the
"friction" caused by the EM radiation.
Further proof, if any were needed, that a short antenna is a poor radiator.
(Frequencies of mechanical rotation representing wavelengthe of several
miles, against which the length of the magnet is trivial, and why, in the
case
of the superconductor example, there is no measurable decrease in
rotational speed, in the short term, at least.)
(Typos in title line corrected)
Further proof, if any is needed, that you are an arm waver incapable
of producing any numbers.
And here is the proof of a compulsion to respond to useless posts.
Pot - kettle - black
You said it - rickman didn't
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
==================
Reply With Quote
Jerry Stuckle
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Jerry Stuckle