Thread
:
A dipole over ground
View Single Post
#
23
November 16th 14, 10:32 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
A dipole over ground
On 11/16/2014 5:04 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/16/2014 1:27 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/16/2014 12:32 AM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/15/2014 9:17 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
snip
Very good. You can cut and paste. Too bad you can't understand what
you're cutting and pasting, especially how to apply it.
You should see someone about getting that stick pulled out that is
firmly shoved up your butt.
After you do that, you can comment on the repeatable data I posted.
ROFLMAO! At least my head isn't there - like yours is.
So where are your insightful comments on the data or is puerile drivel
all you've got?
snip puerile drivel
But I am not going to get into a technical argument with you.
You have no technical arguments.
I do.
So where is it?
snip puerile drivel
ROFLMAO!
Right he
From your post on Thu, 13 Nov 2014 23:12:37:
"Any dipole type antenna will suck on 75M if mounted less than about
100 feet, or about .4 wavelengths."
And other posts.
People who make such comments have no idea what they are talking about.
You can cut and paste all you want. But I don't wrestle pigs.
Are you sure you aren't Big G under another name? You two act the same.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
==================
Reply With Quote
Jerry Stuckle
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Jerry Stuckle