Thread
:
Dipoles, why height matters
View Single Post
#
19
November 22nd 14, 06:06 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
[email protected]
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Dipoles, why height matters
Ian Jackson wrote:
In message ,
writes
Ian Jackson wrote:
snip
Despite the obvious theory, and over 50 years in amateur radio, I still
find it hard to believe that, in real life, an 80m dipole at (say) 20'
ever really outperforms (at any distance) one at (say) 100'. Given the
choice, I know which one I would choose!
Try reading these:
http://www.qsl.net/wb5ude/nvis/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near_ve...idence_skywave
http://www.w0ipl.net/ECom/NVIS/nvis.htm
http://kv5r.com/ham-radio/nvis-antennas/
http://www.arrl.org/nvis
Thanks, I'll certainly have a good read of those articles. But
regardless of what they say, in a typical amateur scenario, I still
reckon that at (say) 300 miles, an 80m signal from a dipole at 100' is
likely to be stronger than one from one at 20' (or even at 60').
As 300 miles is at the upper end of NVIS and the lower end for skywave,
it would be a crap shoot.
NVIS distance is typically 30-400 miles.
--
Jim Pennino
Reply With Quote
[email protected]
View Public Profile
Find all posts by
[email protected]