View Single Post
  #24   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 14, 08:48 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle Jerry Stuckle is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
Default Dipoles, why height matters

On 11/22/2014 1:09 PM, wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/21/2014 8:58 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/21/2014 8:22 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/21/2014 5:22 PM, Wayne wrote:

snip

Along the lines of a "testimonial"...
I once lived in the center of a state that had an active 75 meter net.
At one point I was asked to be one of the net control stations because
of my consistent strong signals within the net.

The secret? A 75 meter dipole at 20 feet with 100 watts.
On longer paths, of course, the "big boys" kicked my butt big time.

Gee, according to jimp, your antenna should have "sucked".

Which shows you are incapapble of understanding the difference between
NVIS propagation and skywave propagation or anything else that I wrote.


Nope, I understand them a lot better than you do. And his comments had
NOTHING to do with what you said. According to you, his antenna
"sucked". Period. No qualification.

My god you are delusional when you are raging.


Read your own words. YOU said it - not me.

If you did understand it, you would know that what he said is TOTALLY
consistant with what I wrote.

And once again you are trying to weasel out of what you said. Just like
a troll.

My god you are delusional when you are raging.



Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you are
wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll.


My god you are delusional when you are raging.



Once again you refuse to discuss the topic. Instead of admitting you
are wrong, you are making ad hominim attacks. How like a troll.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================