Thread
:
Dipoles, why height matters
View Single Post
#
42
November 23rd 14, 01:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Jerry Stuckle
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,067
Dipoles, why height matters
On 11/22/2014 7:10 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 11/22/2014 6:28 PM,
wrote:
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
snip
And the whole point of the 6M statement was that QSL cards or WAS
awards say absolutely nothing about antenna patterns.
Once again you try to change the subject so that you don't have to admit
you are wrong. In case you haven't figured out - 6 meters and 80 meters
are two entirely different bands with completely different propagation
effects. Trying to tie the two together is just an attempt to deflect
the conversation.
I'll just chalk up your total inability to read and understand what
I actually wrote to your current delusional rage.
But in case you get a glimmer of rationality, here is the essence of
my statement: "QSL cards or WAS awards say absolutely nothing about
antenna patterns".
And once again you dismiss something that disagrees with your fantasies.
Just like a troll.
Missed the whole point yet again, didn't you?
Still in a rage, aren't you?
FYI - you don't get QSL cards without a working antenna.
FYI a QSL card is not a measurement of antenna gain or pattern.
You don't get QSL cards without a working antenna.
On second thought - YOU probably do.
It is very interesting that you accept reports which agree with your
fantasies, but not those which conflict with those fantasies.
How like a troll.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K
==================
Reply With Quote
Jerry Stuckle
View Public Profile
Find all posts by Jerry Stuckle